D51 Announces "Painful" Cuts, Unveils Budget Plan

By: Tim Ciesco Email
By: Tim Ciesco Email

GRAND JUNCTION, Colo. (KKCO) - Reductions in staff, slashing programs, and stretching administrative dollars thin are just some of the "painful" plans District 51 has laid out to shore up a $13.6 million budget hole.

During a school board meeting Tuesday night, district staff presented the school board with their proposed 2011-2012 budget.

The $144.8 million budget represents a nine percent reduction from the 2010-2011 school year. Major cuts in state funding, a statutory requirement to increase payments to the state employee pension fund, and the loss of one time federal stimulus dollars all contributed to the reduction.

"This has been a very difficult year," said Steve Schultz, Superintendent of School District 51.

This marks the third straight year the district has had to make significant cuts. And while officials say they've worked hard to keep those cuts out of the classroom, there was no getting around it this year. The vast majority of the district's money -- 87 cents of every dollar -- goes directly to classroom instruction, mainly in the form of teacher salaries and benefits. And officials say you have to make cuts where the money is.

So for the 2011-2012 school year, the district is planning to eliminate 125 positions that include teachers, secretaries, and support staff at all grade levels. The reductions will likely result in larger class sizes, though the district says the increase will be minimal.

Officials say in some cases they simply won't refill positions left open by employees who are transferred, retire, or leave the district. But in other cases, they won't renew contracts of some first, second, and third year teachers.

"It's always difficult when you're having to affect people's jobs," said Schultz. "We value the work those people have done, but we have the revenue we have. We're committed as a district to do the best we can with the revenue we have."

District 51 spokesman Jeff Kirtland says 34 employees' contracts have not been renewed because of budget issues.

An additional 61 positions will be cut because the programs they were tied to are also being cut. That includes the School to Career program, the Valley East School, the reading instructional assistants program, and Glade Park Elementary.

The reduction in staff will save the school district $4.97 million, while the program cuts will save $2.84 million.

"There is not one thing that we've recommended for reduction that did not provide some benefit to students or the school system," said Schultz.

The district has also proposed a $3.84 million cut to administration and operations expenses. Officials point out that in the past three years, 58.3 percent of all cuts have been made from these two areas.

They also say leaving classrooms untouched would have meant completely eliminating administrative services which include payroll, human resources, the superintendent, the executive directors, and more.

The school board will officially adopt the budget in June.

The full rundown of cuts are as follows:

-Reduction of 3 contract days for all employees
-Reduction of extended contracts
-Reduction of 5% in substitute pay

-27.5 elementary school certified positions
-7.5 middle school certified positions
-17 high school certified positions
-0.5 building administration positions
-29 building secretaries and non-instructional support positions
-7 building instructional support positions
-36.5 district-level support positions

-Restructure School to Work / Career program (3 positions)
-Close Valley East School (5 positions)
-Reduce Intervention / Reform program (high school)
-Cut Cosmetology program
-Reduce intervention funds (middle school)
-Cut Club Mid after school program
-Close Glade Park Elementary (2.2 positions)
-Cut reading instructional assistants program (51 positions)
-Reduce district-funded summer extended learning program
-Discontinue NWEA testing
-Eliminate financial support of community organizations

-Fund transfers
-Reduce contact days (transportation)
-Reduce utility expenditures
-Reduce district level instructional support
-Budget cuts for district support departments
-District reduction in General Fund reserves

You must be logged in to post comments.

Password (case sensitive):
Remember Me:

Read Comments

Comments are posted from viewers like you and do not always reflect the views of this station.
  • by Anonymous on May 25, 2011 at 09:48 PM
    Why have our taxes not been cut to a proportionate degree? All those new homes built in the past few years have a very hefty property tax bill.
  • by Come on on May 25, 2011 at 05:42 PM
    It is a combination of parent and teacher effort that helps students succeed. It is ego-centric to thank that you alone are responsible for a student's success. The 1 million was for a pool and it was over 6 years ago, move on! We can blame, blame, blame. Teacher's Union, Republicans, Democrats, overpaid administrators. It would be refreshing if we could look at this as a community problem that our community must solve. Until our community can band together and solve it, we won't solve it.
  • by teacher Location: Grand Junction on May 25, 2011 at 02:52 PM
    Have to say that it takes both the parents and the teachers. Without the teachers, you would be homeschooling. However, the teachers are blamed when a students is failing, isn't proficient on CSAP, etc. Yet we educate all students, regardless of their needs. Supporting teachers efforts through follow through at home, seeing that homework is done, enforcing discipline, having kids at school on time and there everyday unless they are sick. That is the parents roll. Things would improve if the parents financial status was some how affected by students performance.
  • by TLC on May 25, 2011 at 01:29 PM
    Dont forget it was your failed government schools that gave Mesa 1 million dollars a few years back. It was for a soccer field.
  • by Disgusted Location: Ritterville on May 25, 2011 at 10:01 AM
    Thanks Bill, Thanks Barry, Thanks Ken....appreciate it greatly.
  • by Concerned parent Location: GJ on May 25, 2011 at 09:32 AM
    While all this talk of budget cuts with k-12 is going on mesa state college is spending all this money to change its name and expand which means more money down the drain. Why not donate some of that money for k-12?
  • by Concerned parent Location: GJ on May 25, 2011 at 09:31 AM
    While all this talk of budget cuts with k-12 is going on mesa state college is spending all this money to change its name and expand which means more money down the drain. Why not donate some of that money for k-12?
  • by Craig Location: Grand Junction on May 25, 2011 at 08:02 AM
    "a statutory requirement to increase payments to the state employee pension fund" Really? So the teachers and administrators can retire at age 50 with more than 50% of their income in FOR LIFE. Painful cuts? You have no idea what the private sector is going through and we do not have such lucrative pensions. I say, cut and cut some more.
  • by Toby Location: GJ on May 25, 2011 at 07:31 AM
    How about getting rid of all of the freeloading illegals sucking all of our tax dollars dry?
  • by Linda Location: Grand Junction on May 25, 2011 at 06:26 AM
    How about getting rid of the teachers unions? That would lower the cost of living of the teachers so a wage cut would not be as hurtful. All the union dues paid by the teachers, and ultimately by the TaxPayers of Mesa County go to support the well being of liberal democrat politicians anyway. Let the politicians raise money the good old fashioned way, convince the People that you have value to add to the well-being of the Citizens instead of lining your own pockets through backdoor money laundering schemes.
  • Page:
KKCO NBC 11 News
2531 Blichmann Avenue
Grand Junction, CO 81505

Station Phone: 970.243.1111
Business Fax: 970.243.1770
Newsroom Fax: 970.245.3793
News Tip & Contest Line: 970.255.8477
Copyright © 2002-2016 - Designed by Gray Digital Media - Powered by Clickability 122553679 - nbc11news.com/a?a=122553679
Gray Television, Inc.