Proposition 102: Improving Public Safety or a Bailout for Bail Bondsman?

By: Tim Ciesco Email
By: Tim Ciesco Email

GRAND JUNCTION, Colo. (KKCO) - Supporters and opponents of a statewide ballot measure say public safety and taxpayer dollars could be at stake pending the outcome of the November elections.

Proposition 102 asks voters if they want to place limits on how inmates are able to bond out of jail, specifically through a state-run program called pretrial services.

In the legal process, a judge is allowed to issue what's called an unsecured bond -- meaning a bond amount is set and the defendant is released, but they don't pay a penny of it unless they fail to show up for their next court date. Under current state law, many accused criminals who receive unsecured bonds are released to the supervision of pretrial services as a condition of that bond -- something Proposition 102 would change.

Bob Cunningham has been a bail bondsman in Grand Junction for many years. He says as community member he's concerned with what the bond system in Colorado has become.

"To sum this all up, it's a safety issue," said Cunningham, who owns Mr. C's Bail Bonds.

He says when a bondsman bails an inmate out of jail, he or she has a vested interest in making sure that a person appears in court -- namely, they'll lose a lot of money if that person does not. So when a client does skip out on a hearing, a bondsman will go out and catch them.

"We are the true long arm of the law," said Cunningham.

With more than 21,000 felony warrants currently outstanding in Colorado, he says an overloaded state system just doesn't have the resources to go after fugitives like bondsmen -- so when inmates released to pretrial services don't show up to court, they're essentially free and able to roam the streets.

"Who's going to be responsible for them?" said Cunningham. "What consequences are they going to have to pay when they don't show up for court or they go out there and commit another crime?"

That's why he's supporting Prop 102, which would dramatically limit the number of inmates who could be released to pretrial services.

"Those funds could be better used to pay for good officers on the street or bigger jails," said Cunningham.

Mesa County Sheriff Stan Hilkey admits the system isn't perfect but says the only things Prop 102 makes safer are the pockets of bail bondsmen.

"Proposition 102 really is a self-serving kind of proposition," said Hilkey.

With pretrial services out of the picture, he says inmates who can't post their own bond would have no choice but to go to a bondsman to get out of jail -- a slower process, he says, many inmates would not be able to afford.

"You're going to see the jail population skyrocket around the state," said Hilkey.

According to the state's non-partisan assessment of Prop 102, the state would have to spend an additional $2.8 million on jail services if it passes.

"Private business is attempting to take over a government piece of this pie," said Hilkey. "And the irony is they're going to do it at the expense of taxpayers."

Hilkey also argues that pretrial services are making a difference -- that data shows crime rates are not going up because of it and inmates who go through the program are less likely to be repeat offenders.

To learn more about the arguments for and against Prop 102, click on the link below listed under "Related Links." (the section on Prop 102 begins on page 32.)

You must be logged in to post comments.

Password (case sensitive):
Remember Me:

Read Comments

Comments are posted from viewers like you and do not always reflect the views of this station.
  • by Suzy Location: Brighton on Oct 11, 2010 at 09:43 AM
    I am voting yes on Prop 102.. I agree that the goverment needs to stop controling all businesses, big or small..
  • by Anonymous Location: Grand Junction on Oct 3, 2010 at 04:24 PM
    p-offed, I'm not entirely sure you read the whole story if you're calling it one-sided. They presented both sides of the argument allowing people who do actually read beyond the headline to make an informed decision about whether or not they will support this proposition.
  • by p-offed Location: grand junction on Sep 29, 2010 at 10:58 PM
    This Prop 102 is not about bailing out bailbondsmen. This is about bailing out the taxpayer. Get your story straight channel 11. Also two years ago Mr. Hatzinger was praising the bailbondsmen, how the bail bondsmen saved the tax payers millions of dollars. If the Sentenel and the rest of you one sided news agencies in Grand Junction would show this cd done just two years ago the citizen would get the truth on how our arogant and flip floppish the DA really is. Show some courage and tell the truth so the people can decide, for this is about the safty and tax dollars that are at stake here. We will be demonstrating in front of the county court house from 10:00 am to 12:00 anyone interested in the truth please show up. Thank you. This is about the people! Get it? If you do not want another welfare program for criminals vote Yes on Prop 102!
  • by Sandy Location: Grand Junction on Sep 29, 2010 at 12:20 PM
    Pretrial services is another way of allowing lazy judges and lawyers to get away with not doing their jobs. People at the pretrial service office are arrogant, bossy little twits who are on power trips. Vote yes on Prop 102
  • by Anonymous on Sep 29, 2010 at 12:12 PM
    !2 years of business in Grand Junction. This is the 3rd sheriff in office since I started bonding. Hilkey is sadly mistaken about the bondsman, he in fact helped his jail by cutting off the bondsman from his jail and putting in an outragous collect calling system. Then he will not allow a professional visit by a bondsman . I am a professional surety with a license. I am outraged that this sheriff would speak out against the bondsman. When his staff is the one booking in and out of custody. We used to get them out every 15 minutes now its around 4 -5 hours. Maybe if pretrial services did not have the floor in our jail right in booking we would be able to do a bond in a timely fashion. This guy needs to be educated, or tell the truth.
  • by Anonymous on Sep 29, 2010 at 10:37 AM
    Really? The bondsman want to take over the government ran program? That is incorrect. Government wants the whole pie. Thats the bottom line.
  • by alma Location: grand junction on Sep 29, 2010 at 09:19 AM
    YES on 102!! Government already has enough control of business. They want more and our own Sheriff Dept supports this? Enough is enough.
  • by marya Location: glade park on Sep 29, 2010 at 09:06 AM
    Do you trust our govenment to do a better job for taxpayers? How have they done so far?
KKCO NBC 11 News
2531 Blichmann Avenue
Grand Junction, CO 81505

Station Phone: 970.243.1111
Business Fax: 970.243.1770
Newsroom Fax: 970.245.3793
News Tip & Contest Line: 970.255.8477
Copyright © 2002-2016 - Designed by Gray Digital Media - Powered by Clickability 103980629 -
Gray Television, Inc.