Mesa County Sheriff reacts to Obama's gun proposals

By: Andie Adams Email
By: Andie Adams Email

MESA COUNTY, Colo. (KKCO)— Questions are circulating through the Grand Valley about local law enforcement’s stance on President Obama’s gun control announcement.

On Wednesday, Obama unveiled a $500 million gun violence package that would ban military-style assault weapons and high-capacity magazines, as well as close loopholes in gun background checks.

Since then, residents have been calling on Mesa County Sheriff Stan Hilkey to reveal his position on this issue.

Thursday, Hilkey released a statement that assures citizens that he has “no intention of following any unlawful orders nor do I have any tolerance of efforts to disarm law-abiding citizens.” Instead, he suggests putting weapons in the hands of people working in schools and public places.

However, Hilkey goes on to say that he will respect the lawful business of federal law enforcement.

Here is his full statement:

I have been contacted by many people in the last few days concerning encroachments on the rights afforded by the Second Amendment of our Constitution. Many of those contacts include questions as to my intention to support my Oath of Office and the Constitution along with questions about my role as Sheriff in protecting those rights.

I apologize in advance that I can’t answer each inquiry individually due to the volume, but I do want to more widely state what I’ve said many times regarding this issue.

I'd like to assure everyone that as your Sheriff I've always taken my Oath of Office seriously, and have no intention of following any unlawful orders, nor do I have any tolerance of efforts to disarm law-abiding citizens. If you have followed me at all through my career you will know that I remain consistently supportive of our Constitution, and most specifically in this conversation, the Second Amendment.

Having just spent a week with nearly all of Colorado’s Sheriffs in conversations that included this important topic, I want to assure you that I see Sheriffs closely following the national conversation and listening to their constituents. I am fully ready to use my influence appropriately to represent common interests of all in protecting our Second Amendment rights.

I have always been supportive of keeping guns out of the hands of violent criminals and measures to deal with those that would do things that threaten all of our rights, as long as those measures don’t tread on the rights of honest, law-abiding American citizens. I have never been in favor of creating solutions that are in search of a problem. I am frustrated that the national conversation is focused more squarely on firearms than mental health issues. Like most Sheriffs in America, my jail has far too many people that cycle through with mental health issues that are unaddressed, undiagnosed, or have fallen through the cracks to receive the care they need. Improving our behavioral health system, plugging holes within it, and sharing information about people posing a risk across a wide spectrum of disciplines is the most fertile ground for addressing the kind of mass violence that has sparked the national level of emotion currently seen.

I also hold the belief that instead of talk of disarming law-abiding citizens, we should be talking about allowing those working in schools and public places who want the ability to protect themselves to be able to do so by carrying their personal firearm discretely but confidently with the training that would allow them to make a difference with an active shooter. Again, I view this area as fertile ground of public policy making that could help save lives.

I will also, however, respect the lawful and properly conducted business of federal law enforcement agencies and continue to be good partners in solving community problems that have served well the public safety interests of our community. Frankly, those federal partners I work with have children in our schools, share these same concerns with the rest of us, and are no less patriotic than any of us. To be clear though, I will support the Constitution, enforce the laws of my state, and fulfill my statutory responsibilities as required. If an agent of the federal government violates a state law in my county we will take appropriate enforcement actions, and I will resist, appropriately, efforts by the federal government to manage my agency or unduly and unlawfully infringe upon the rights of our citizens.

Finally, I feel blessed that I've had the opportunity to be a Sheriff in this great country, state and Mesa County. As an elected official who has worked an entire career knowing that it is my job to earn and keep your trust, I know, very well, who I work for...It is something that I will never forget. Thank you for that opportunity.

Sheriff Stan Hilkey



You must be logged in to post comments.

Username:
Password (case sensitive):
Remember Me:

Read Comments

Comments are posted from viewers like you and do not always reflect the views of this station.
  • by CrustyOldGeezer on Jan 19, 2013 at 09:02 AM
    Sheriff Hilkey, Would you be supportive of efforts to remove laws that have been proven to be 'unenforceable', 'unworkable', ineffective, and 'unenforced' since implemented? Currently there are in excess of twenty thousand such 'gun laws' and absolutely no evidence that any of them have actually save one life. They are a serious drag on the RIGHTS of the Citizens. Not to mention "Infringements" with zero purpose other than to infringe.
  • by Danny Burns Location: Grand Junction, Co on Jan 18, 2013 at 06:22 PM
    Stan, I have known you since you first signed on w/MCSO. I was President Of the Posse 1983/84. With all due respect, The media including Fox, and most law enforcement is doing a dis-service those of us who support the Constitution and the Second Amendment. You all refer to a large portion of firearms as, Assault Weapons. “Assault” implies aggression on the part of the user…. When in fact, it is a Tactical Weapon, used to defend our country and our homes. Hopefully, you and others will re-think that terminology. It just gives the “Gun Grabbers” more ammunition for their argument. Thanks Stan...Respectfully, Danny Burns, Cave Creek, AZ and Grand Junction, CO
  • by Anonymous on Jan 18, 2013 at 12:04 PM
    So, with the stroke of a pen law abiding people of Colorado can become "Armed Criminals" over night because of the radical left Democrats who controls Colorado’s Government. I sure hope that the Colorado State Troupers don't use the “no knock warrant” like Lawyer did. There will be a lot of dead Colorado Citizens. God Help Us
  • by Anonymous on Jan 18, 2013 at 09:51 AM
    With the statement, if the State of Colorado Bans ar15 rifle and High capacity magazines, since it is a State law Sheriff Hilkey as he said will follow the law and if it is in the law he will confiscate the magazines and Guns. State law he will follow. With the state house and Governor controlled by Democrats, it is a good chance this will happen.
KKCO NBC 11 News
2531 Blichmann Avenue
Grand Junction, CO 81505

Station Phone: 970.243.1111
Business Fax: 970.243.1770
Newsroom Fax: 970.245.3793
News Tip & Contest Line: 970.255.8477
Copyright © 2002-2016 - Designed by Gray Digital Media - Powered by Clickability 187460841 - nbc11news.com/a?a=187460841
Gray Television, Inc.